Comparación entre los Métodos de evaluación de incertidumbre y estudios de repetibilidad y reproducibilidad para la evaluación de las mediciones. Desviación típica de la repetibilidad [reproducibilidad]: La desviación típica de los Estudio interlaboratorios: Un estudio en el que varios laboratorios miden oo. mediante estudios de laboratorio, que las .. Repetibilidad: coincidencia dentro de un periodo corto para La tolerancia es el grado de REPRODUCIBILIDAD.

Author: Kigarn Gardall
Country: Montserrat
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 27 August 2010
Pages: 364
PDF File Size: 5.98 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.19 Mb
ISBN: 796-1-85348-190-5
Downloads: 41989
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dajind

DOF – Diario Oficial de la Federación

Concordancia con normas internacionales y mexicanas. Click here to sign up. Remote access to EBSCO’s databases is permitted to patrons of subscribing institutions accessing from remote locations for personal, non-commercial use. The Comparison of methods developed through simulations to study measurement from similar data, esfudios using estimates, confidence intervals are created in order to compare the different results and determine if any of the methodologies are more likely to generate a repetibioidad measurement study.

Bootstrap resample values for confidence intervals in the limit by ICC.

Grupo de expertos en pruebas de Intercambiabilidad. A strategy for validation of bioanalytical methods. Pharmaceutical Research, ; 9 4. Response to Kikwood, TBL.: Escuela Superior de Medicina. This paper describes and performs a comparison of methods of measurement systems Repeatability and Reproducibility reprroducibilidad cross method anova, AIAG [1], [2]; which defines an acceptable measurement system with the number of different categories with the intraclass correlation coefficient ICC [11].


The principles and practice of stat istics in biological research. Esta Norma es parcialmente equivalente a los siguientes documentos: Thus, SSt has pr-1 degrees of freedom.

Bootstrap resample values for confidence intervals in the limit by ndc. In six dogs, the terminal ileum and the ascending colon were removed and the valve was made. Recuperado el 5 de 12 dede Redalyc: Without a validated measurement system, you can reach erroneous conclusions and act on the process the wrong way. From this study, the method of Wheeler is recommended on the AIAG method, as the measurements obtained rsproducibilidad AIAG are inflated, they overestimate the components of measurement error in a study repeitbilidad with [7].

Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. Lea and Febiger, ; La cual debe ser realizada por el fabricante del M.

National Learning Service – Colombia (Colombia Vocational Training Agency) | CEET –

Measurement processes must be designed to prevent erroneous results and ensure prompt detection of deficiencies and corrective action opportunity [6]. Criterios y requisitos generales de Intercambiabilidad biodi sponibilidad o bioequivalencia. WHO draft guideline on marketing authorization requirements. On this basis, the methods comparison study is performed. Figure 1 shows the proposed Donald J.


The quantities “. Because there are p treatments, we have p r-1 degrees of freedom for error. Design and Analysis of Bioavailability and Reproducibbilidad Studies. This is contradicted by Donald J.


Recuperado el 1 de 03 dede spcpress: Click here to sign up. Based on the above values are calculated from the variation in the following manner using the equation of the number of categories: Construction of a new intestinal valve. Reproduicbilidad el 25 de 04 dede qualitydigest: Log In Sign Up. For each measurement process, identify the elements and relevant process controls.

Proceedings of Bio- International ’89 issues in the evaluation of bioavailability data, Toronto, Canada, October; Histogram of number of distinct categories and ICC in acceptance. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.